Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Painted Mail Pouch barns going, going, but not gone
Pork exports are up 14%; beef exports are down
Miami County family receives Hoosier Homestead Awards 
OBC culinary studio to enhance impact of beef marketing efforts
Baltimore bridge collapse will have some impact on ag industry
Michigan, Ohio latest states to find HPAI in dairy herds
The USDA’s Farmers.gov local dashboard available nationwide
Urban Acres helpng Peoria residents grow food locally
Illinois dairy farmers were digging into soil health week

Farmers expected to plant less corn, more soybeans, in 2024
Deere 4440 cab tractor racked up $18,000 at farm retirement auction
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
U.S. District Court dismisses lawsuit over pork trademarks


WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Feb. 2 dismissed a lawsuit challenging the sale of the “Pork. The Other White Meat.” trademarks the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) sold to the National Pork Board (NPB) in 2006 for $35 million.

Last month, the USDA filed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by the Humane Society of the U.S. (HSUS) against the agency over the sale by the NPPC to the NPB of the famous trademarks – a purchase the USDA had approved.

USDA’s Jan. 6 motion authorized the transaction as part of its oversight responsibilities under the 1985 Pork Act, which set up the pork checkoff program and established the National Pork Board in Des Moines to administer it.

“We are conducting a thorough review of the decision and evaluating our options,” said Ken Maschhoff, NPPC president and a Carlyle, Ill., pork producer.

“We are disappointed that the court partially denied the USDA’s motion to dismiss this frivolous lawsuit, one that was never based on a legitimate legal challenge to a federally approved transaction but instead was brought by an anti-meat activist group intent on eliminating meat consumption and harming a vast U.S. industry that employs hundreds of thousands of Americans and feeds billions of people at home and abroad.”

The USDA argued the lawsuit, filed by HSUS and two other parties, lacked merit, was barred by a six-year statute of limitations and that the plaintiffs failed to establish standing to file the lawsuit or show they were harmed by the sale of the trademarks. USDA’s evaluation of the sale of the trademarks showed they provided significant value to the pork industry.

In 2012, HSUS and other plaintiffs – which included Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement, an environmental and animal activist group, and an individual Iowa resident who is a member of the group – claimed the trademarks were sold for an inflated price.

The U.S. District Court had dismissed the suit for lack of standing. But a federal appeals court in August 2015 reinstated it, sending the case back to the District Court. Before any proceedings on the merits of the lawsuit, the USDA inexplicably entered into settlement talks with the HSUS.

The NPPC sold the assets, widely regarded as one of the most recognizable marketing brand assets in history, for an estimated $35 million, financing the purchase over 20 years, making the NPB’s annual payment $3 million.

A USDA-conducted study later valued the trademarks at between $113 million-$132 million. Despite the nearly quadruple increase in value, the HSUS decided to continue its lawsuit.

The goal of the “Pork. The Other White Meat.” campaign was to increase consumer demand for pork and to dispel the meat’s reputation as a fatty protein. The Other White Meat campaign was developed to position pork as a good-tasting, versatile and nutritious meat that is easy to prepare and appropriate for any meal.

Since its inception, the campaign has gained tremendous recognition from consumers. In 2000, a study conducted by Northwestern University found The Other White Meat brand to be the fifth most memorable promotional tagline in the history of contemporary advertising.

“The NPPC enjoys the strong support of pork producers nationwide,” Maschhoff said. “Regardless of the final outcome in this case, we are well positioned to continue fighting for the livelihood of farmers and others in rural America.”

2/14/2018