Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Deere 4440 cab tractor racked up $18,000 at farm retirement auction
Indiana legislature passes bills for ag land purchases, broadband grants
Make spring planting safety plans early to avoid injuries
Michigan soybean grower visits Dubai to showcase U.S. products
Scientists are interested in eclipse effects on crops and livestock
U.S. retail meat demand for pork and beef both decreased in 2023
Iowa one of the few states to see farms increase in 2022 Ag Census
Trade, E15, GREET, tax credits the talk at Commodity Classic
Ohioan travels to Malta as part of US Grains Council trade mission
FFA members learn about Australian culture, agriculture during trip
Timing of Dicamba ruling may cause issues for 2024 planting
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Views and opinions: Cattle prices are tanning cowboys’ hides

 

Forty years ago Waylon and Willie asked the nation’s mamas not to “let your babies grow up to be cowboys” because “… they’ll never stay home, and they’re always alone, even with someone they love.”

That sage advice is even more true after a spring cattle market that’s been too wild to forget and too brutal to want to remember.

In late February, August live cattle futures closed near $116 per cwt. By April 3, however, prices fell to $99.60. Prices did rebound to $104 on April 27 but cracked again, to $98.25, on May 18.

The rollercoaster ride made cattle growers rightfully sick. The hoped-for sale price for a 1,325-pound slaughter steer went from $1,537 in late February to $1,300 in mid-May. That $237 per-animal difference, according to Iowa State University breakeven calculations, cost feeders all their profit – and then some.

For example, cattle growers with 500 head of cattle saw their inventory devalue by $118,500 in fewer than 90 days this spring. A feeder with 5,000 head on feed witnessed a $1.185 million drop in value, while a 50,000-cow commercial feedlot saw $11.85 million evaporate.

The mid-May price slump was just “paralyzing to the industry,” longtime cattle market analyst Walt Hackney told Iowa Public Television’s “Market to Market” audience on May 18.

“What happened,” he explained, “was the opportunity for the buyers” – meatpackers – “to take a shot at the feedlots,” and they did. As a result, Hackney noted “the packer was making a lot of money on the cattle.”

And almost every penny of it was from the cowboys’ hides.

That’s serious market power and it’s a hallmark of today’s highly integrated, highly concentrated cattle market, says Darrin Qualman, a graphically minded market analyst in Saskatchewan.

To prove it, Qualman charted a century of inflation-adjusted Canadian cattle prices. The results, explained in an April blog post titled “The Cattle Crisis: 100 Years of Canadian Cattle Prices,” are both colorful and bruising.

A key finding shows from 1942 through 1989, Canadian cash cattle prices stayed within the $1.50-$2.50 per pound (or $150-$250 per cwt., Canadian dollars) inflation-adjusted price range. Interestingly, cattle prices spiked out of that range only three times – and all to the high side.

In 1989, however, that range shifted substantially downward; prices began to toggle between 80 cents and $1.60, or $80-$160 per cwt. Worse, prices have stayed within these limits since.

How did the old bottom line, $1.50 per pound, essentially become the new top line? Qualman dug deep for an answer.

“Prices and profits are only partly determined by supply and demand,” wrote the former Canadian National Farmers Union researcher. “A larger factor is market power. It is this power that determines the allocation of profits within a supply chain.”

For Canadian – and also American – cattle growers that means “in the late ’80s and continuing today, the power balance between packers and farmers shifted as packers merged to become giant, global corporations … (Then) it shifted further as packers … began to utilize captive supplies (cattle they control by contract or ownership) and … shifted further still as trade agreements thrust farmers in every nation into a single, hyper-competitive global market.”

This massive shift in market power from “cattle farmers” to meatpackers, noted Qualman, had a “devastating” effect on farmers: “Since the late-1980s, Canada has lost half its cattle farmers and ranchers.”

The story is the same on this side of the border and nearly everywhere else. Trade agreements, global meatpackers, captive slaughter supplies and little to no competition among packer-buyers have made beef – be it Canadian, American, Brazilian or Martian – into an international commodity, not a regional or national product. That will not change.

Nor will the price at the grocery store. Lower cattle prices, predicted for the rest of 2018, will not bring lower retail meat prices because meatpackers, despite their name, are really in the market power business – and right now, business is very, very good.

 

The views and opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of Farm World. Readers with questions or comments for Alan Guebert may write to him in care of this publication.

6/7/2018