Search Site   
Current News Stories
The Temecula Valley Historical Society story
Foraged & Sown: Booming business born on one-tenth acre
Mule helps scientist build clearest horse, donkey genomes yet
Grain handling equipment loaded up bids at Kaufman auction
Book offers tips to dog owners to help their pups thrive
Hearty campfire meal better option than fancy city dining experience
AI is reshaping American food and ag, but federal policy lags behind
Indiana farmland values remain stable despite regional differences
Illinois looking for buyer of closed Tyson Food beef facility
Truck and tractor show raises money for Ross FFA chapter
EPA exempts 29 small refineries under 2025 RFS program
   
News Articles
Search News  
   
New York City’s foie gras ban challenged
 
NEW YORK (AP) – New York City’s planned ban on the sale of foie gras is being challenged in court by two upstate farms that claim it would leave them financially devastated.
The two major foie gras producers, Hudson Valley Foie Gras and La Belle Farm, said the law enacting the ban set to go into effect Nov. 25 should be declared “invalid and void” in a lawsuit filed recently in state court in Manhattan.
Proponents say the production of foie gras – the fattened liver of a duck or goose – is cruel to the animals because it involves force feeding.
While the ban has been cheered by animal welfare advocates, the farms said the loss of the vital city market would jeopardize their operations. La Belle anticipates having to let go most of its 100 employees and may be forced out of business. Hudson Valley would have to terminate dozens of employees, according to the complaint.
The farms argue the city law should be invalidated in part because it imposes a ban on the sale of products that can be produced and sold in compliance with state and federal law. The lawsuit also argues that the city exceeded its authority by “attempting to eliminate” farming operations about 80 miles away.
“The city’s attempt to legislate a farming practice occurring outside its borders is unprecedented and alarming,” according to the complaint.
A spokesperson for the city corporation counsel said the lawsuit is under review.

6/7/2022