Search Site   
Views & Opinions

Farmers seeking new regulations in drone industry


Hoosier Ag Today

Economic indicators rotate into strange and new orbits


Capital Comments

Waters of U.S. rule becoming a political test


Food and Farm File

People in India aren’t starving, but please eat Brussels sprouts


Hoosier Ag Today
Why do such little pills get such big, difficult names?


Lunch and a library all in the same little restaurant


Instead of a rose garden, God may give you a field


Learn more to do, at 2014’s Hoosier Outdoor Experience
Montana rancher changes to improve quality of herd
   
Views & Opinions
Montana rancher changes to improve quality of herd


“It made me mad!”
That’s what a Montana rancher told me when talking about the first carcass data he ever got back.
“I got tired of trying to sell them. I wasn’t willing to accept generic price when I thought I had something better,” he said. “I soon learned.”
Those first calves graded 20 percent Choice, and motivated him to continue feeding cattle for the next two decades. It also spurred the rancher to adopt an AI plan to infuse the best genetics more quickly.
Today he sells loads above 90 percent Choice with more than half of those reaching the upper two-thirds of that grade.
A visit to a Wyoming ranch earlier this summer illustrated the other end of the surprise spectrum. When the cattleman decided to retain ownership five years ago, he knew it was a risk. He’d been buying “top dollar” bulls, but had no way of knowing how those genetics performed beyond weaning. And then he got the call from his cattle feeder.
“You can’t believe what you’ve got,” the yard manager told him. The inaugural, retained-ownership load went better than 90 percent Choice and earned branded premiums. “Don’t change a thing.”
The bulls were working, the cows were working, but that producer didn’t want them in a holding pattern. His first data just served as benchmark that he’s been building on ever since. And yes, they’re still getting better.
Not all surprises are apparent right away. When an Iowa cattleman got his first carcass report on cattle finished with a local farmer-feeder, it was interesting, but not all that informative.
“Under the marbling, we had all the different scores and, well, I didn’t understand them,” he told me. Denotations like “AB10” and “AB20” could have just as well been a product code or carcass locator number.
So months down the road when the producer asked a custom feedyard manager to explain the packer data, he got quite a shock.
“He broke it down and said, ‘Those are exceptional cattle, and that’s Prime on the carcasses.’”
What is his goal now? He wants to move the whole herd into the “AB” (abundant marbling) category.
I’m lucky to chat with cow-calf producers all across the country, and many of them followed in the tradition of selling weaned calves before transitioning to retained ownership at some point. Rarely do I hear, “That’s exactly what I expected my data to look like.”
But they almost always tell me – regardless of how positive or negative the surprise – it was worth it.
The Iowan said, “If I’m going to pay that kind of money for genetics, I wanted to make sure ‘it’ was in there. And it was in there in spades.”
There is power in knowing how your product performs. Why do you think companies beg for online reviews or restaurants incentivize you to complete post-visit surveys? The information they learn from feedback helps them make systems improvements, marketing tweaks and generally get better at giving their customers what they expect.
Most cattlemen I know want to do just that. Maybe it’s time to get a little vulnerable and try feeding some cattle. Just brace yourself for a few surprises along the way.

The views and opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of Farm World. Readers with questions or comments may write to the author in care of this publication.