Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Diverse Corn Belt Project looks at agricultural diversification
Deere settles right-to-repair lawsuit for $99 million; judge still has to approve the deal
YEDA: From a kitchen table to a national movement
Insurer: Illinois farm collision claims reached 180 last year
Indiana to invest $1 billion to add jobs in ag, life sciences
Illinois farmer turned flood prone fields to his advantage with rice
1,702 students participate in Wilmington College judging contest
Despite heavy rain and snow in April drought conditions expanding
Indiana company uses AI to supply farmers with their own corn genetics
Crash Course Village, Montgomery County FB offer ag rescue training
Panel examines effects of Iran war at the farm gate
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Is the Ohio deal between ag and HSUS an empty pact?

Truth from the Trenches
By Melissa Hart

After reading an article about a press conference with Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) CEO Wayne Pacelle and the Ohio Department of Agriculture, I can’t decide which is worse: the cunning effect HSUS has on the livestock producers in Ohio, or the naïveté of Ohio agriculture.

Pacelle was noted as saying he upholds the ballot decisions Ohioans approved last fall calling for the formation of the Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board, and its charge to set standards of welfare for farm animals. He said HSUS recognizes the vote of the citizens of Ohio on Issue 2, and they recognize the authority of the livestock board.

I wonder; are we getting Pacelle’s empty, yet well-spoken, words at this press conference mixed up with someone who cares about Ohio animal agriculture? Out front, he can deliver well-spoken talking points with the best of them, but it’s time to look beneath the speech and remember who is speaking.

This is the same man who has millions of dollars at his disposal and his agenda is simple: Abolish animal agriculture everywhere.

When he said that he upholds the ballot decisions of Ohioans, my immediate question is: Does he have a choice? Seriously? And the answer is a resounding “no.” He has no choice.

He may not agree with it, but he can’t, singlehandedly, do anything about it.

Pacelle said HSUS recognizes the authority of the Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board. Really? Then why are they trying to tell livestock producers how to raise livestock with the implementation of their (HSUS) changes of how livestock are to be handled?

The truth is, they don’t want anyone to be livestock producers – end of story.  And if they don’t want anyone producing animal products, then the only concern they have with how livestock are handled is that they aren’t handled.

The agreement between HSUS and the Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board is not legally binding and is described by Pacelle as a “gentlemen’s agreement between parties, a good-faith effort to figure out a pathway forward for all of us.”

Does anyone else have trouble with the authenticity of this statement? Since when is the CEO of the world’s largest anti-animal agriculture group concerned with a pathway forward for livestock producers?

While I appreciate the efforts of Ohio agriculture trying to clear a path toward the progress of keeping HSUS out of their business, I have to wonder if they are being led down the primrose path by one of the most cunning individuals of all time.

It appears to me this HSUS leader is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. He has dressed himself up to be understanding and tolerant. While he appears concerned for all, keep in mind: He had to kill the sheep and tan the hide before he came with his sheepish grin to the table of compromise.

The views and opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of Farm World. Readers with questions or comments for Melissa Hart may write to her in care of this publication.

9/1/2010