Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Mounted archery takes aim at Rising Glory Farm
Significant rain, coupled with cool weather, slows Midwest fieldwork
Indiana’s net farm income projected to drop more than $1 billion this year
Started as a learning tool, Old World Garden Farms is growing
Senator Rand Paul introduces Hemp Safety Enforcement Act
March cattle feedlot placements are the second lowest since 1996
Diverse Corn Belt Project looks at agricultural diversification
Deere settles right-to-repair lawsuit for $99 million; judge still has to approve the deal
YEDA: From a kitchen table to a national movement
Insurer: Illinois farm collision claims reached 180 last year
Indiana to invest $1 billion to add jobs in ag, life sciences
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Monetary fights are proxy arguments for value talks

Too many couples get bogged down in money arguments; no wonder! Money decisions represent ways people show what they value in life. Money arguments are proxy arguments for value discussions.

Is it on alcohol and cigarettes? Is it fancy cars and fancy homes? Is it a lake home or a timeshare? Exotic vacations? Education? Savings? Retirement? Contributions to charity? Tithes to their church? Private acts of charity?

Are they collectors? Passions, hobbies and compulsions show up in checkbooks.

Are people comfortable living on the edge or in debt? How aggressive are they in investing money to make money? Can they delay gratification and save for goals, or do they carry consumer debt? Do they pay interest or collect interest?

How money is spent is a test of how a couple comes together in choosing a compatible lifestyle. It represents the merging of dreams, goals, ideas and values.

Money matters force couples to really be a couple and to unify for common purposes. The decision-making process of who spends the money shows how power in handled in a relationship. Is it a joint-decision-making process or does one partner arbitrarily make purchases without consulting the other?

Money is a test of loyalty and fidelity. Is there a pattern of deceit, lies, secretive spending, gambling or impulsive spending? Spending obligates both parties and incurs obligations or debt on both parties. Not adhering to an agreed-on spending plan shows a blatant disregard for the feelings of one’s partner.
It feels like betrayal. It is betrayal. It is a violation of the marital boundaries. In some cases it rivals an affair in terms of the violation of trust that it triggers.

How to prevent money fights

Have an actual budget that functions as a true operating plan for spending decisions. Too many people say they understand the importance of a budget, but don’t take the time to sit down and deal with the reality of their money decisions. Too many couples, if they have a written budget, act as if it doesn’t mean anything anyway.

Ignorance may be bliss, but it is also the blueprint for having repetitive money arguments instead of actually coming together to really solve the problem. Meet at least monthly to review your budget.

Spend less than you make. You can’t get by on a deficit budget. Some short-term cash flow problems can be part of the budget, but basic expenditures can’t exceed income. Greed and impulsive spending have to be curbed within the discipline of a budget.
The budget needs to be realistic. Use actual data, not pie-in-the-sky estimates. Discuss fuzzy areas, such as food, clothing, maintenance, entertainment, gifts, holiday spending and the like.
Unify income and spending into a common framework. It is “our” income, “our” expenses, “our” savings, “our” debt, “our” investments and “our” credit cards. Each is accountable to the other. Each is responsible to the other.

It doesn’t matter who makes what or who spends what, or whether there are two checkbooks or one checkbook or one credit card or several credit cards, if decisions are made through a single budget.

If you operate your money separately, you might as well be roommates or in a “living together” arrangement. Either you are a team and trust each other, or else you are too independent.
No secret spending; this is a violation of the marital bond. Addictions need to be acknowledged and treated. Seek professional help rather than violate money agreements in the marriage.

Establish discretionary spending for each partner that is a part of the overall budget. Make it realistic. This is one area where you don’t need to be accountable to each other except for living within the established amount.

Have pre-established limits on spending that trigger an automatic joint-decision process before expenditures are made. Do this even if the resources are there to cover the expense. Honor your agreements. Expensive gifts, well meant, can be a violation of trust.

If budgetary exceptions occur that jeopardize the overall budget, confer with each other on how to incorporate the expense into the existing budget. The same would be true for a “windfall” or an unexpected income that isn’t included in the budget.

Have emergency funds to cover three months of family expenses. Emergency funds give you peace of mind. Work toward this goal if it isn’t possible at first.

Are you getting into trouble?

These are some “red flag” indicators of being overextended. These are taken from a book, Till Debt Do Us Part by Bernard Podruska of Brigham Young University.

•Spending up to or beyond credit limits
•No emergency funds
•Making only minimum payments
•Being unaware of the amount of debt
•Making late or missing payments
•Applying for additional credit cards
•Refinancing or consolidating loans
•More than 20 percent of take-home pay is used to make debt payments
•Deceiving your spouse on the amount you spent or owe
•Debts are turned over to collection agencies
•There is no plan for avoiding debt, reducing living expenses or getting out of debt

For an interesting exercise, apply these same red flag indicators to our national conversation about sovereign debt and why we are in a huge national quarrel about what to do about it. Money arguments are proxy arguments for value discussions. Maybe we are ready for a balanced budget amendment.

Dr. Val Farmer is a clinical psychologist specializing in family business consultation and mediation with farm families. He lives in Wildwood, Mo., and may be contacted through his website at www.valfarmer.com

Farmer’s book To Have and To Hold is on sale for $10 and can be ordered by sending a check or money order for $10 plus $3.95 for shipping and handling for the first book and $2 for each additional book to: JV Publishing, LLC, P.O. Box 886, Casselton, ND 58012.

8/10/2011