Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Multiple benefits of cover crops were shown in 9th annual survey
Ohio and Indiana growers are honored by Red Gold
Waterhemp prevalence has increased in the Midwest
Crop prices are the good news; input costs are the bad news
IFB delegates discuss data centers, taxes at policy session
Fredericktown, Ohio, birthplace of the iconic FFA blue jacket
2,500 jobless, producers without a market after abrupt Tyson closure
Producers express concern after Trump announces beef imports
Several rounds of storms cause flooding, wind damage
Illinois FFA member one of 4 American Star Farmer finalists
Hybrid pioneer Gene Funk Jr. honored with plaque
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Crop insurance company answers views in a recent Pennings column
After reading the June 20 Policy Pennings article, Moral hazard may inhibit crop insurance system, (Farm World, page 4) we felt it necessary to respond because it attempts to portray all farmers as trying to game the system for financial gain.

While bad examples can be found in all industries, our experience over 10-plus years working with hundreds of crop insurance customers in no way supports the examples used in this article.
First, the system has policies, procedures, audits and penalties (i.e. federal prison) that discourages these incidents, but most importantly the vast majority of farmers have a sense of fair play and honesty. For the article to suggest otherwise is just offensive to those of us who respect and cherish the farmer clients we work with every day.

We suspect the only moral hazards here are the authors who are only interested in highlighting obscure or unfounded examples that support their political view of the crop insurance system.

Ron Hassler                   Gerald Nickel
Crop Insurance Manager   President
Midwest Ag Finance          Midwest Ag Finance
7/5/2012