Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Started as a learning tool, Old World Garden Farms is growing
Senator Rand Paul introduces Hemp Safety Enforcement Act
March cattle feedlot placements are the second lowest since 1996
Diverse Corn Belt Project looks at agricultural diversification
Deere settles right-to-repair lawsuit for $99 million; judge still has to approve the deal
YEDA: From a kitchen table to a national movement
Insurer: Illinois farm collision claims reached 180 last year
Indiana to invest $1 billion to add jobs in ag, life sciences
Illinois farmer turned flood prone fields to his advantage with rice
1,702 students participate in Wilmington College judging contest
Despite heavy rain and snow in April drought conditions expanding
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Crop insurance company answers views in a recent Pennings column
After reading the June 20 Policy Pennings article, Moral hazard may inhibit crop insurance system, (Farm World, page 4) we felt it necessary to respond because it attempts to portray all farmers as trying to game the system for financial gain.

While bad examples can be found in all industries, our experience over 10-plus years working with hundreds of crop insurance customers in no way supports the examples used in this article.
First, the system has policies, procedures, audits and penalties (i.e. federal prison) that discourages these incidents, but most importantly the vast majority of farmers have a sense of fair play and honesty. For the article to suggest otherwise is just offensive to those of us who respect and cherish the farmer clients we work with every day.

We suspect the only moral hazards here are the authors who are only interested in highlighting obscure or unfounded examples that support their political view of the crop insurance system.

Ron Hassler                   Gerald Nickel
Crop Insurance Manager   President
Midwest Ag Finance          Midwest Ag Finance
7/5/2012