Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Insurer: Illinois farm collision claims reached 180 last year
Indiana to invest $1 billion to add jobs in ag, life sciences
Illinois farmer turned flood prone fields to his advantage with rice
1,702 students participate in Wilmington College judging contest
Despite heavy rain and snow in April drought conditions expanding
Indiana company uses AI to supply farmers with their own corn genetics
Crash Course Village, Montgomery County FB offer ag rescue training
Panel examines effects of Iran war at the farm gate
Area students represent FFA at National Ag Day in Washington
Garver Farm Market wins zoning appeal to keep ag designation
House Ag’s Brown calls on Trump to intercede to assist farmers
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Another surprising USDA quarterly stocks estimate
URBANA, Ill. — The USDA’s quarterly estimates of corn inventories in the United States have become a source of substantial surprises for the corn market. Since March 2010, 11 of the past 13 quarterly stocks estimates have deviated from expectations by enough to generate large price movements.

During that period, USDA stock estimates have been both much larger and much smaller than generally expected, according to University of Illinois agricultural economist Darrel Good. “Market participants form expectations for the quarterly stocks estimates based on the level of stocks at the beginning of the quarter and a projection of use during the quarter,” Good said. “Exports and domestic-processing uses of corn during the quarter can be projected fairly close.

“Projections of feed and residual use of corn are based on a variety of factors, including historical use, the most recent levels of use, livestock numbers, livestock feeding profitability and the likely levels of feeding of other commodities. Surprises in the USDA estimates, then, mean that feed and residual use during the quarter deviated from market expectations. Those deviations, in turn, alter expectations for feed and residual use for the remainder of the marketing year and the likely level of stocks at the end of the marketing year.”

Good explained while it should be expected the market will not always correctly anticipate USDA estimates, the recent pattern of large and seemingly alternating direction of the surprises in the quarterly corn stocks estimates is problematic.

“One of the results is a pattern of feed and residual use of corn that varies considerably from quarter to quarter and from year to year,” Good said. “That pattern can make it difficult to anticipate future feed and residual use, and can result in wide swings in projections of feed and residual use for the marketing year or estimates for the previous year, in the case of the September 1 stocks estimate.

“A number of examples can be cited, but consider the most recent experience. The smaller-than-expected estimate of stocks for September 1, 2012, resulted in the estimate of feed and residual use for the 2011-12 marketing year being increased by 162 million bushels.”

The smaller-than-expected estimate of Dec. 1 stocks resulted in the forecast of 2012-13 marketing year feed and residual use being increased by 300 million bushels in the February 2013 World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates Report (WASDE).
That forecast was increased by another 100 million bushels in a rare change, in the March WASDE report.

Good believes the projection will be sharply reduced in the report to be released on April 10. Good said the difference between the USDA’s March 2013 stocks estimate of 5.399 billion bushels, released on March 28, and the average trade guess was about 370 million bushels, one of the largest differences in the past 30 years.
“Old-crop corn futures declined by more than 80 cents per bushel in the initial reaction to the larger-than-expected estimate,” Good said. “The dilemma now, however, is what to expect for the June 1, 2013, stocks estimate. The implied rate of feed and residual use of corn in the first half, and particularly in the second quarter, of the 2012-13 marketing year is quite low.

“The slow rate of feed and residual use does not seem consistent with livestock numbers, a sharp reduction in the production of distillers grains and the implied negative feed and residual use of wheat during the same six-month period ... Experiences over the past three years suggest that the June corn stocks estimate may ‘correct’ for some of these apparent inconsistencies. If that turns out to be the case, the magnitude of the current price weakness may not be justified. Because the reasons for the sometimes large deviations between USDA estimates and market expectations are not obvious, the June estimate may or may not provide another surprise.”
4/10/2013