Nowhere was he more plainly vulnerable, they reasoned, than in his attitude toward the Sabbath laws. The prohibition against labor on the Sabbath was one of the foundation stones of the Ten Commandments, the basic law of Israel, not to mention the various legal codes derived from it.
So, when they saw his disciples picking grain in a field on the Sabbath, they believed they had caught him in an untenable position. To their question, "Look, why are you doing what is not lawful on the Sabbath?" there could be only one answer. So they thought.
Jesus, however, seldom did or said the obvious. Instead, he reminded them that King David himself had violated one of their laws when, starving with his troops, he entered the restricted temple sanctuary and ate the sacrificial bread that was reserved solely for the priests. Their need for food was greater in God’s sight than the ritual law.
The reply of Jesus must have stung his critics, for once again he avoided their trap and caught them in one of their own making. Worst of all, although they were experts in the interpretation of scripture, Jesus had used it to confound them.
How ironic: They had intended to humiliate him, but they were the ones who were embarrassed.
The principle by which Jesus responded was simply that the law is not God and we must look behind the law to view the purpose of God, which it is intended to serve.
On another occasion, when authorities were hounding him because they suspected he was going to heal someone on the Sabbath (healing, they reasoned, was labor and the Sabbath law prohibits labor), Jesus reduced the question to its simplest and most logical form: "I ask you, is it lawful on the Sabbath to do good or harm, to save life or destroy it?" (Lk. 6:9).
And on still another occasion recorded in Mark, Jesus said: "The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath" (Mk. 2:27). Again and again, they asked the wrong questions and, as it turned out for them each time, they also asked the wrong person.
They were caught up in their concern for their proud interpretations of the laws; instead, they should have been asking themselves What does God want in this situation? So, they missed the point because they most revered their legalisms, putting them in the place where only God Himself should be.
Is it still true today that when religion goes wrong, often it is because we are asking the wrong questions for the wrong reasons?