Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Panel explores ways to restore competition in agri-food chain
INFB conference offers ways for farmers to expand operations
Michigan fruit harvests underperform due to weather-related issues
Michigan statewide regenerative soil program enters its third year
State-level wetlands law draws concerns in Illinois
Shelbyville student competes in National High School rodeo
USDA seeking public comment on beef carcass grade update
Agronomy Farm’s inaugural field day showcased soybeans
Clay Target league provides team experience for rural youth
Farm equipment sales down but combine purchases up in June
Corteva consolidates four seed brands under Hoegemeyer label
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
GIPSA rule, disease concerns, head House livestock hearing
BY RACHEL LANE
D.C. Correspondent 
 
WASHINGTON, D.C. — From wildfires on the Plains to avian influenza, the last
few weeks for the American livestock industry have been a particularly ongoing
challenge.
 
Policies in place for sheep, cattle, poultry and pork farmers were a focus last
week as the House Agriculture Committee Subcommittee on Livestock and
Foreign Agriculture continues to examine the current farm bill and how to improve
it. Proposed rule changes for the USDA Grain Inspection Packers and
Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) were widely discussed during the meeting as a
cause for concern.
 
“The rule has been opposed by the vast majority of cattle producers since it was
first introduced in 2010,” said Craig Uden, president of the National Cattlemen’s Beef
Assoc. (NCBA). “(Meat) packers have indicated that they are not willing to open
themselves up to frivolous lawsuits and the legal risks this change in the competitive
injury standard would create.”
 
Uden said any attempt to restrict ownership of livestock should also be avoided.
The language that has previously been proposed would limit a packer’s ability to own livestock.
 
“These types of restrictions would limit the marketing options available to our producers and would represent interference in the marketplace by the federal government which we adamantly oppose,” he said.
 
Among other issues, NCBA also opposes mandatory country-of-origin labeling,
or COOL, programs, he explained. Uden said the group supports keeping conservation
programs and research programs in the farm bill, and testified that a footand-
mouth disease (FMD) vaccination bank needs to be stocked better in the
United States. “FMD is highly contagious and has the potential to spread widely
and rapidly, debilitating cloven-hoofed animals, such as cattle, swine, and
sheep … An FMD outbreak in the United States could potentially cost our nation’s
livestock producers billions of dollars in the first 12 months alone,” he added.
In addition to concerns about FMB and the need for a bank, Bob Buchholz – a
member of the board of directors of the American Sheep Industry Assoc. and
past president of the Texas Sheep and Goat Raisers Assoc. – said sheep producers
are worried about predatory wildlife, which cost producers about $137 million
annually, legal immigrant agriculture workers and mandatory price reporting.
He said trade is needed by the industry because 50 percent of American wool is
exported.
 
Pork is another industry that relies heavily on international trade, said David
Herring, vice president of the National Pork Producers Council.
3/30/2017