Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Kentucky farmer turns one-time tobacco plot into gourd patch
Look at field residue as treasure rather than as trash to get rid of
Kentucky farm wins prestigious environmental stewardship award
Beekeeping Boot Camp offers hands-on learning
Kentucky debuts ‘Friends of Agriculture’ license plate
Legislation gives Hoosier vendors more opportunities to sell products
1-on-1 with House Ag leader Glenn Thompson 
Increasing production line speeds saves pork producers $10 per head
US soybean groups return from trade mission in Torreón, Mexico
Indiana fishery celebrates 100th year of operation
Katie Brown, new IPPA leader brings research background
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
$1.1 trillion federal budget passes; shutdown averted
By JIM RUTLEDGE
D.C. Correspondent
 
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Farm and agriculture programs
escaped the White House’s sharp knife days ago,
after Congress passed and President Donald Trump
signed a $1.1 trillion appropriations bill for 2017, averting
another shutdown deadline and funding the federal
government though September.
 
The Senate approved the measure by a vote of 79-18
with three senators abstaining. Trump signed the package
last Friday. The White House had proposed cutting
more than $18 billion from the appropriations, but
Congress succeeded in getting most of the measure it
wanted.
 
Two days earlier the House had passed the bill without
$1.5 billion in funding Trump wanted to start building the
U.S.-Mexico border wall; however, Congress did approve
$343 million to repair border fencing and $1.2 billion for
new and expanded communications and surveillance
technologies and equipment, and border access roads.
Congress also approved more than $15 billion in new
defense spending to total $598 billion, including monies
for new ships and warplanes and a 2.1 percent pay
hike for the military. Funding was also approved for
NASA and $34.1 billion to the National Institutes of
Health and $8.8 billion for the FBI and other federal
law enforcement agencies.
 
The agreement, under Congressional negotiations for
the past several months, approved several billions of
dollars in USDA programs supporting farmers and the
agricultural sector.
 
Included was $3 million to fund a national campaign
to promote genetically modified organisms (GMO) in
food, pushed by more than 50 agricultural and food industry
groups. In late April the groups called on Trump
to launch the outreach effort, saying the campaign
was needed to convince the American public that GMO
foods are safe.
 
Funding was not approved for a proposed cottonseed
Title 1 program, but negotiators directed new USDA
Secretary Sonny Perdue to come up with a plan in 60
days to help cotton farmers.
 
Lawmakers fought off efforts by the White House to
eliminate the $182 million McGovern-Dole Food Education
program that has fed more than 3.4 million individuals
in 14 countries in recent years. More than
$20 million was set aside to assist 68,000 individuals
in local and regional programs.
 
In an argument to cut the program, the White House
said there was little evidence to prove the funding had
been effective.
 
The omnibus bill also increased loan money to the
Farm Service Agency to assist farmers hurt by decreased
access to credit and low commodity prices.
 
Funds for the program were depleted months ago.
Congress added a 33 percent increase to the USDA’s $49
million Rural Business and Cooperative Grant Program,
boosting it by $16 million. High on the chopping block
was abolishing $82 million to train migrant farm workers,
but Congress said “no” and funded the jobs programs.
 
More than $112 million was cut from the Food for
Peace Program, but lawmakers avoided efforts to scrap
the $363 million effort altogether. It is a 60-year program
maintained by the State Department that has
been vital to feeding billions in developing countries
and critical for national security, supporters said.
 
Several national farm groups, including the National
Farmers Union, the National Corn Growers Assoc. and
the National Cattlemen’s Beef Assoc., did not respond to
Farm World seeking comment after the vote. “We don’t
have anything to say about it,” a spokesman for American
Farm Bureau Federation said in an email response. 
5/10/2017