Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Beekeeping Boot Camp offers hands-on learning
Kentucky debuts ‘Friends of Agriculture’ license plate
Legislation gives Hoosier vendors more opportunities to sell products
1-on-1 with House Ag leader Glenn Thompson 
Increasing production line speeds saves pork producers $10 per head
US soybean groups return from trade mission in Torreón, Mexico
Indiana fishery celebrates 100th year of operation
Katie Brown, new IPPA leader brings research background
January cattle numbers are the smallest in 75 years USDA says
Research shows broiler chickens may range more in silvopasture
Michigan Dairy Farm of the Year owners traveled an overseas path
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Is high-school education quality declining in rural United States?
Following a recent memorial service for a wonderful woman who farmed with her husband and contributed much to her community, I joined with several people who shared a table for the luncheon afterward. They were discussing secondary school education.
 
Secondary school achievement test scores have declined in Iowa, according to recent news reports. I started to offer my opinion, but thought better of it.

Instead, I asked the discussion participants what contributes to lower secondary school achievement test scores than a generation ago in Iowa, a state that has often been heralded as having some of the best school achievement test scores and graduation rates in the United States. Secondary schools are usually defined as schools from grades 9-12.

They had a lot to say. Their comments led me to think that rural people in other states might also have something to say about student achievement in their secondary schools.

Besides the handful of people at the table, I interviewed 10 people living in rural communities (ranging from 24,000 to 200 residents) and four farm residents in Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska and South Dakota, to ask what they thought about today’s secondary student education and any concerns they might have.

The people I interviewed do not constitute a stratified random sample of all rural people in their states. Interestingly, however, their opinions seem to bear out the findings of several recent extensive examinations of the quality of education in rural areas that I reviewed.

Concerns about rural secondary education centered on changes in parenting and blaming schools. A parent who teaches in high school and a grandparent who volunteers to tutor children after school both proclaimed that parental expectations for children have changed over the past couple of decades.

These two people said some parents today don’t back up the teachers and administrators like the parents of past generations:

“They blame the teacher when their child fails a test, instead of asking their child about studying for the test.”

“These parents want to feel approved of by their kids, so they ‘take their side’ instead of supporting their teachers,” said another mother.

“Kids don’t have home chores as much anymore, and instead spend time after school on their computers and smart phones until supper,” said a farm dad in Missouri with whom I spoke.

Almost everyone I interviewed on the phone or by email said that both parents, including farmers, have to work outside their homes in most rural households in order to obtain sufficient family income.

Everyone, including their high-schoolers, are too busy.

A Nebraska high school student I interviewed said he is happy to come home to help his parents on their farm because he gets to spend time with his family. Hauling hay and grain are his favorite duties, because he enjoys the time conversing with his parents and older brothers who operate the farm. He feels “involved” and wants to farm after completing college.

Recent reports identify rural/urban differences in secondary education. A 2016 article in The Atlantic said, “Critics are right that achievement scores aren’t overwhelmingly impressive and that troubling gaps persist across racial, ethnic and income groups.

“Yet, scores are up over the past 40 years, and the greatest gains over that period have been made by black and Hispanic students. They’re right that the U.S. finishes well behind exam-oriented countries like Taiwan and Korea on international tests.

“But scores are roughly on par with countries like Norway, which was named by the United Nations the best place in the world to live; and students from low-poverty states like Massachusetts outscore most of their global peers.” A comprehensive examination of rural education by the USDA, Rural Education at a Glance, 2017 Edition, reached two main conclusions:

•Education is closely related to the economic prosperity of rural people and places; however, an increasingly educated rural America still lags urban areas in educational attainment.

•Educational attainment is strongly related to labor market outcomes in rural areas. Earnings increase with educational attainment.

Rural workers with less than a high school diploma faced the highest unemployment rates and the largest declines in earnings during the 2007-09 recession period, compared with those who had at least a high school diploma.

Since the end of the recession in 2009, employment and educational attainment in rural areas have improved, but slowly. A 2016 U.S. News and World Report article that analyzed 2016 U.S. Census Bureau data concluded there is a rural/urban divide that shows rural Americans are more likely to own a home, less likely to have earned a college degree and more likely to have served in the armed forces than their urban counterparts.

Rural residents, including many farmers, want better jobs and go to the cities to find them. Everybody wants a job with sufficient income – a factor that figured heavily in the outcome of last November’s elections.

The views and opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of Farm World. Dr. Mike Rosmann is a psychologist and farmer in western Iowa. Readers may contact him at mike@agbehavioralhealth.com
6/8/2017