Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Beekeeping Boot Camp offers hands-on learning
Kentucky debuts ‘Friends of Agriculture’ license plate
Legislation gives Hoosier vendors more opportunities to sell products
Increasing production line speeds saves pork producers $10 per head
US soybean groups return from trade mission in Torreón, Mexico
1-on-1 with House Ag leader Glenn Thompson 
Indiana fishery celebrates 100th year of operation
Katie Brown, new IPPA leader brings research background
January cattle numbers are the smallest in 75 years USDA says
Research shows broiler chickens may range more in silvopasture
Michigan Dairy Farm of the Year owners traveled an overseas path
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Carry, appearance factors in limited old-crop movement
Trade is showing more interest in the weekly crop ratings, as steady declines have taken place for the past several weeks.
 
The greatest concern is in states of the Western Corn Belt, where corn condition has slipped to the lowest rating level of the year. There are also worries over the soybean crop, as the weekly rating is now the lowest since 2012.

One of the most-asked questions in the market recently is why it is not reacting to weather concerns across the Corn Belt. The main reason for this is we have seen a large amount of weather-related buying in recent years, and then once harvest started, the crops were not nearly as small as expected.

As a result, traders are not as willing to extend their buying this year until crop loss can be better defined. Reports of better-than-expected corn yields out of southern states is also limiting speculative buying at this time.

There are still a lot of unknown factors surrounding the stocks data that were released at the end of June, the main one being what it will take to encourage the movement of on-farm stored bushels. Buyers are hoping futures will rally enough to encourage movement and that they will not need to adjust basis values.

This may work on commercial-stored bushels, but producers claim they will need considerably higher values to pull inventory out of on-farm facilities. It is also possible that the unwillingness to move farm-stored inventory has nothing to do with price.

It is interesting to see that onfarm stored corn in the Eastern Corn Belt is up 16 percent from a year ago, compared to a 9 percent increase in the Western Corn Belt. This is happening even as we see corn move from the Western Belt into the East.

The corn being held in the Eastern Belt reportedly has quality issues, mainly fungus, and farmers need higherquality new crop for blending purposes before they will move anything.

Another reason we are seeing limited old-crop movement may be crop appearance. Typically old-crop movement is higher where developing crops look better. Cash buyers in regions where movement is limited are now assessing not only what it will take to pry old-crop bushels loose, but what they may encounter when trying to source new-crop needs.

Carry in the cash market is also impacting movement. Given the large carry in the market between now and the new crop, we are seeing old-crop bushels sold for delivery at that time.

While this is giving buyers an ample amount of new-crop coverage, it could create a void in the old-crop months that will need to be filled. It is not out of the question that this could cause logistic issues this fall as well.

Even with limited movement, basis values across the interior market are starting to soften. This is mainly from seasonal tendencies – some buyers have adequate coverage to last through the remainder of the old-crop marketing year and see no reason to extend bids at this time. Others are ready to take downtime and claim they will remain idle until new-crop bushels become available.

There has been a lot of talk in the market surrounding the higher corn values and how they have pressured processing margins. While this has happened in the ethanol industry, not all end users are feeling negative effects.

One is the livestock industry, where high packer margins are offsetting the elevated cost of corn. These individuals believe corn values would need to top $4.50 to become a negative factor for feeding.

While much of the attention in the market has been on whole grain exports, just as much needs to be on products. This is especially the case on corn, where global product demand is growing.

The most increase is in ethanol, where the latest monthly report for May shows a 75 percent increase in exports from the same month a year ago. So far this marketing year, U.S. ethanol exports are up 23 percent from last year.

While soybean sales out of South America have increased, they remain light compared to historical averages.

This remains a result of depressed soybean values. Soybeans in Brazil are currently valued at a 30 percent discount to those of a year ago, and in many cases this puts them below break-even.

It is quite likely this lack of selling and reduced revenue will also impact how many new-crop acres we see planted.

There is another belief why South American soybean sales are slow this year; some analysts are pointing toward the possibility that yields may not be as great as reported. These individuals believe Brazil soybean production was from 1 million-3 million metric tons fewer than reported, and is preventing sales from happening.

While this is a possibility, the fact that Brazilian farmers are using more storage than in the past is a more likely factor.

Karl Setzer is a commodity trading advisor/market analyst at MaxYield Cooperative. His commentary and market analysis is available daily on radio, in newsprint and on the Internet at www.maxyieldcooperative.com 
The opinions and views in this commentary are solely those of Karl Setzer. Data used for this commentary obtained from various sources are believed to be accurate.
7/26/2017