Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Beekeeping Boot Camp offers hands-on learning
Kentucky debuts ‘Friends of Agriculture’ license plate
Legislation gives Hoosier vendors more opportunities to sell products
Increasing production line speeds saves pork producers $10 per head
US soybean groups return from trade mission in Torreón, Mexico
1-on-1 with House Ag leader Glenn Thompson 
Indiana fishery celebrates 100th year of operation
Katie Brown, new IPPA leader brings research background
January cattle numbers are the smallest in 75 years USDA says
Research shows broiler chickens may range more in silvopasture
Michigan Dairy Farm of the Year owners traveled an overseas path
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
National survey saying cover crops no longer niche market

By SUSAN BLOWER

WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. — A national survey of 2,012 farmers shows that acreage planted in cover crops has nearly doubled in the past five years.

In addition, 88 percent of those surveyed use cover crops and reported increased yields of corn, soybeans and wheat, as well as improved control of herbicide-resistant weeds.

“What the survey tells us is that, if you look at demographic information – farm size, tillage type, location, experience with cover crops – you can see that cover crops are no longer a niche market in agriculture,” said Chad Watts, executive director of Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC) in West Lafayette, and survey organizer.

Since 2012, when the annual survey began, cover crop acreage has steadily increased to an average of 400 acres per farm in 2016, up from 217 in 2012. For 2017 planting, farmers expected to increase cover crop planting to an average of 451 acres.

“I think the information from farmers shows us that there are many farmers, from large to small, row-crop to vegetable/truck farmers, tillers to those who choose not to till, who are interested in using cover crops. There are also farmers who have heard about cover crops and do not know where to start in terms of making them a part of their farming system,” Watts said.

Released last week, the poll was conducted by CTIC with help from Purdue University and funding from Sustainable Agriculture and Research Education (SARE) and the American Seed Trade Assoc.

Survey participants reported that after cover crops, corn yields increased an average of 2.3 bushels per acre, or 1.3 percent; soybean yields increased 2.1 bushels, or 3.8 percent; wheat yields increased 1.9 bushels, or 2.8 percent.

Farmers typically plant cover crops in the off-season after harvest to provide ground cover, nutrient sequestration and weed suppression and improve soil health. However, the report shows an emerging trend to inter-seed covers into growing cash crops – with 27 percent of respondents reporting seeding cover crops at sidedress fertilization time or in late summer.

At the other end of the cycle, a growing number have tried “planting green” and said it helped suppress weeds, manage soil moisture and maximize other benefits.

“I was surprised to see that 39 percent of farmers have tried ‘planting green,’ meaning that they plant their commodity crop such as corn or soybeans into a cover crop that is still alive, and then terminate it after planting,” said Rob Myers, regional director of extension programs for North Central SARE at the University of Missouri.

“I would venture that five years ago, only a few percent of farmers would say they had tried that because the conventional thinking had been to terminate cover crop ahead of planting, often multiple weeks ahead of corn or soybean planting. This indicates farmers are wanting to maximize their cover crop benefits by letting the cover crop grow longer and are continuing to evolve in how they manage cover crops.”

A majority of farmers – 59 percent – are now dealing with herbicide-resistant weeds on their farm, according to the report.

“This highlights the importance of cover crops as one of the tools in fighting herbicide-resistant weeds, with over two-thirds (69 percent) saying they always or sometimes got better control of herbicide-resistant weeds after growing cereal rye,” Myers said.

Also, 85 percent said cover crops have contributed to soil health. Although the survey did not directly address a cost analysis of cover crops versus benefit, Myers said after 2-3 years he believes cover crops pay for themselves in many ways. Cost-share funding can offset the first year of using cover crops.

“There are harder to quantify short-term economic benefits from cover crops, such as better nutrient management, better weed control and reduced soil compaction, with long-term benefits such as improved organic matter and better overall soil health,” he explained.

One of the most important outcomes of the SARE/CTIC cover crop survey is insight into what motivates farmers to use cover, Watts said. “Among cover crop users, we are seeing great enthusiasm for the soil health benefits of cover crops, with a widespread appreciation for the long-term benefits of covers. Among non-users, we’re getting a strong signal they want more information and training.”

Watts said training can include educational resources on seed selection, planting method and termination advice, as well as matching novice farmers with on-farm consultants, advisors or other farmers who are already using cover effectively.

Find previous surveys online at www.sare.org/covercropsurvey

9/27/2017