Search Site   
Current News Stories
The Temecula Valley Historical Society story
Foraged & Sown: Booming business born on one-tenth acre
Mule helps scientist build clearest horse, donkey genomes yet
Grain handling equipment loaded up bids at Kaufman auction
Book offers tips to dog owners to help their pups thrive
Hearty campfire meal better option than fancy city dining experience
AI is reshaping American food and ag, but federal policy lags behind
Indiana farmland values remain stable despite regional differences
Illinois looking for buyer of closed Tyson Food beef facility
Truck and tractor show raises money for Ross FFA chapter
EPA exempts 29 small refineries under 2025 RFS program
   
News Articles
Search News  
   
Federal judge halts loan forgiveness program for farmers of color
 
MILWAUKEE (AP) — A federal judge has halted a loan forgiveness program for farmers of color in response to a lawsuit alleging the program discriminates against white farmers.
U.S. District Judge William Griesbach in Milwaukee issued a temporary restraining order suspending the program for socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported.
The program pays up to 120 percent of direct or guaranteed farm loan balances for Black, American Indian, Hispanic, Asian American or Pacific Islander farmers. President Joe Biden’s administration created the loan forgiveness program as part of its COVID-19 pandemic relief plan.
Emily Newton, the lead attorney representing the U.S. Department of Agriculture in the lawsuit, didn’t immediately respond to an email seeking comment on the restraining order.
Minority farmers have maintained for decades that they have been unfairly denied farm loans and other government assistance. Federal agriculture officials in 1999 and 2010 settled lawsuits from Black farmers accusing the agency of discriminating against them.
Conservative law firm Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty filed suit in April arguing white farmers aren’t eligible, amounting to a violation of their constitutional rights. The firm sued on behalf of 12 farmers from Wisconsin, Minnesota, South Dakota, Missouri, Iowa, Arkansas, Oregon and Kentucky.
6/14/2021