Search Site   
Current News Stories
Reader questions answered on BBSE, nutrition and vaccines
America 250 Grant helps support Ag Museum’s antique tractor, engine show
Dairy margins flat to slightly firmer in second half of March
Time to get sugar water feeders ready as hummingbirds arrive
Protein demand is rising thanks in part to MAHA aligned food system
Tractor rollovers and machinery entanglement most common hazards
EPA approves temporary waiver for nationwide E15 sales
Crash Course Village, Montgomery County FB offer ag rescue training
Panel examines effects of Iran war at the farm gate
Area students represent FFA at National Ag Day in Washington
Remembering Orion Samuelson, the ‘Voice of Agriculture’ for 60 years
   
News Articles
Search News  
   
New grain terminal opposed in Louisiana
 
NEW ORLEANS (AP) – Descendants of people enslaved in Louisiana are seeking to keep a $400 million grain terminal out of their community by suing to abolish the land’s 1990 “corrupt rezoning” as industrial.
That ordinance was pushed through as part of a Formosa Plastics Corp. deal that collapsed and later sent a former parish president to prison, according to a lawsuit filed in state court.
Greenfield Louisiana LLC, which plans to build a grain elevator, loading terminal and 54 silos, said the project would be clean, safe and provide more than 100 jobs.
Some residents doubt this. They are led by twins whose great-great grandmother was born into slavery and whose parents opposed use of the same land for a Formosa Plastics Corp. rayon plant 30 years ago.
“Although we won the battle we did not win the war,” because Greenfield Louisiana is now using the zoning created for Formosa, Jo Banner said at a livestreamed news conference after the lawsuit was filed.
Jo and Joy Banner said there’s no place for such a terminal in Wallace, a mostly Black community of 775 about 25 miles from New Orleans.
“Their suit stems from the 1990 corrupt rezoning,” a news release said.
Six years after the land was rezoned, former St. John the Baptist president Lester Millet Jr. was convicted of extorting $200,000 from the friend he chose to broker the land sale.
After arranging the sale, Millet “promised Formosa that if it purchased the Whitney Plantation for the rayon facility, he would use his authority to push through the needed rezoning,” the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals wrote in 1997. That opinion upheld Millet’s 1996 conviction for extortion, money laundering and a racketeering-related charge, his sentence of nearly five years, and an order to repay the money.
Formosa had dropped its plans in late 1992 “in part because of mounting public opposition and in part because of the activities of Lester Millet,” the federal appeals court wrote.
Banner said her parents withstood pressure 30 years ago: “either sell or the parish will take our home.”
Some homes in Wallace would be only 260 feet away from the project, which also would include “a conveyor structure nearly as tall as the Statue of Liberty,” the lawsuit states.
Whitney Plantation and Museum, which casts a cold eye on slavery, now owns part of the land originally rezoned for the Formosa project. The museum, a historic church founded by freedmen after the Civil War, and a cafe owned by the Banners are among those that would be hurt if Greenfield builds there, according to the suit.
Greenfield’s parent company, Medlock Investments, is owned by San Francisco investor Christopher Medlock James, whose Engine No. 1 investment firm unseated three ExxonMobil board members earlier this year.
“Recently, he has been the subject of numerous glowing profiles hailing the ‘activist investor’ for allegedly making Exxon more eco-friendly,” the news release said. “He has managed to maintain his reputation as a crusading environmentalist only because his central role in the grain terminal is not yet widely known, the Banners say.”
James backs “the cleanest, safest and most-efficient way to support U.S. farmers,” Greenfield Louisiana responded by email through a public relations firm. The project “has won support from residents and public officials because of its direct local benefits, including good jobs,” it continued.
Dust control systems, enclosed conveyor belts, “ship loading spouts designed to eliminate dust during loading,” self-cleaning silos and hazardous monitoring systems would keep it clean and safe, the website states.
“The project will meet and far exceed all environmental protection standards,” the email said.
State District Judge J. Sterling Snowdy set a hearing Dec. 16 in Edgard for the zoning challenge, said Bill Quigley, an attorney for the grain terminal opponents.
“When you allege that a law is a nullity, you get to move to the front of the line,” he said.
11/23/2021