Search Site   
Current News Stories
2026 forecast for milk per cow raised 65 pounds, to 24,585
House Ag Committee leader dissects Farm Bill 2.0
Indiana fishery celebrates 100th year of operation
Facility to disperse sterile screwworm flies opens in Texas on former base
Katie Brown, new IPPA leader brings research background
January cattle numbers are the smallest in 75 years USDA says
Charles Green remembered for his generosity and his Holstein herd
Record snow drought is impacting some western states
Chrisman FFA captures Can-Do Challenge title with 3,000 canned items
American Farm Bureau: Chapter 12 bankruptcy filings spiked last year
Broiler chicken output strong, expansion opportunities narrowing
   
News Articles
Search News  
   
Bridge ownership disputed in Alaska
 
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) – The ownership of a bridge leading to a planned new agricultural district west of Nenana is under dispute, with an Alaska Native tribe blocking the bridge to keep out construction crews.
The Nenana Native Association, which has ended the blockade, asserted it owns the sparsely used bridge over the Nenana River, and can limit access to the area, the Anchorage Daily News reported. The mayor of Nenana, Joshua Verhagen, said the city owns the bridge and public right-of-way.
State officials said they’re looking into the ownership question.
The bridge provides a gateway to an area where Alaska Natives say they have long hunted, fished and trapped. It also provides access to the agriculture district. Construction crews this week were expected to begin working on improvements to an existing road.
The tribe has lodged concerns with efforts to open land to farming under the so-called Nenana-Totchaket Agricultural Project that the state and community of Nenana have pursued for years.
The bridge was completed in 2020 with $9 million in federal funding secured by the tribe, after Nenana launched construction with $6 million in state support.
Caroline Ketzler, first chief of the Nenana Native Association, said the state had not communicated properly with the tribe about the project.
“It deals directly with our food security as a village, that’s where we do a lot of hunting and gathering and we always have,” Ketzler said. “We want to do as much as possible to keep that land and that fragile ecosystem still functioning.”
Verhagen said the city supports the agricultural project because it could lead to more food security as farmers raise crops and livestock.
Ketzler acknowledged the tribe’s views over time have changed about that project and that it has grown opposed to further development in the area. She said the tribe is not pulling its opposition to the road extension at this time.
The blockade began Oct. 31 and ended late the next day after state transportation department officials met with the tribe. Ketzler described the meeting as productive. Organizers said the plan was to block only road crews and that none tried to travel through.
Danielle Tessen, a department spokesperson, said there was discussion about forming a team of officials from the state, road contractor and the tribe to improve communication, with other interested parties welcome to join. She said the large project requires extra communication.

11/16/2022