Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Controlled breeding, calving season can improve efficiency
Alto Ingredients hosts facility tour  and discusses year round E15
Horses on the Hill brings therapy, beauty to Cincinnati neighborhood
Farmers should weigh benefits of cover crops with cost, yield
Antique Cretors popcorn wagon still popping after 100 years
Kentucky farmer plants his entire crop using autonomous equipment
Indiana and Tennessee taking steps to prevent spread of NWS
Roadside Stand Trail does better than organizers expected
NWS confirmed in the U.S., Rollins says sterile flies are the answer
Replanting is happening in some areas due to wet weather
Ground broken for $2 million Peoria Farm Bureau building
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Keeping cattle healthy is best insurance policy
Sometimes it only takes a couple of 2-cc subcutaneous shots to head off problems down the line. Sometimes it takes a few tons of steel, careful planning and focused construction. And remember that time when all it would have taken was to close one gate to save a day’s work?
 
In any case, when it comes to beef cattle, prevention is way better than trying for a fix later.

Ben Franklin was referencing fire safety when he wrote an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, but the 16-to-1 edge often understates it. Thrill seekers aside, when most of us perceive risk, we try to avoid or reduce it.

The market for both cattle and the inputs to feed them include hedging and options, from futures to USDA price insurance and private contracts. Producers can limit risk with a continuous presence in the market so they literally win some, lose some, but experience allows for winning more than is lost.

There are all kinds of insurance and strategies to manage financial risk and beat the odds on weather-related losses. Keeping cattle healthy, however, takes more direct action that limits their stress and delivers just the right dose and timing of vaccines.

These strategies save billions of dollars in potential losses, but like other plans to prevent or reduce risk, they are not perfect.

It’s worth noting that consumers try to manage their risk when buying beef, too. As the price of beef increased over the last decade, consumers learned it doesn’t pay to save money by trading down to lower quality grades. Instead, they started paying a little more attention to the grades and brands that delivered eating satisfaction time after time. Their continued purchases of higher quality beef as those prices went up shifted the demand curve in favor of the top end. The price signals moved through the market.

Out on the cattle farms and ranches, people reacted  by shifting their genetic selection decisions to capture more of the growing market for premium beef. Genomic technology allowed for greater accuracy so that the U.S. fed beef supply saw a rapid rise in quality. It all makes sense in the interwoven tapestry of risk reduction.

The old mindset of commodity beef production held that “pounds are all that matter.” Decades of declining consumer demand for that commodity as other proteins won the price-per-pound contest led to new strategies in this century.

Consumers have shown they’ll gladly buy several excellent ounces of premium beef before they will buy a  round of no-roll, unbranded beef that risks refusal at the table.

The views and opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of Farm World. Readers with questions or comments for Steve Suther may write to him in care of this publication.
8/30/2017