Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Indiana fishery celebrates 100th year of operation
Katie Brown, new IPPA leader brings research background
January cattle numbers are the smallest in 75 years USDA says
Research shows broiler chickens may range more in silvopasture
Michigan Dairy Farm of the Year owners traveled an overseas path
Kentucky farmer is shining a light on growing coveted truffles
Farmer sentiment drops in the  latest Purdue/CME ag survey
Chairman of House Committee on Ag to visit Springfield Feb. 17
U.S. soybean delegates visit Egypt to discuss export markets
Farmers shouldn’t see immediate impact of ban on foreign drones
Women breaking ‘grass ceiling,’ becoming sole operators of farms
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Dean Foods says ‘no’ to clones
WASHINGTON (AP) — The nation’s biggest milk company, Dean Foods, said it will refuse milk from cloned cows.

The Food and Drug Administration gave preliminary approval to meat and milk from cloned animals and could grant final approval by the end of the year. Federal scientists say there is virtually no difference between clones and conventional cows, pigs or goats.

Smaller companies such as Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream and Organic Valley previously have said they oppose milk from clones. Dallas-based Dean Foods is a $10 billion (euro7.63 billion) company that owns Land OLakes and Horizon Organic, among dozens of other brands. In a statement issued Thursday, the company said its customers and consumers do not want milk from cloned animals.

“Numerous surveys have shown that Americans are not interested in buying dairy products that contain milk from cloned cows and Dean Foods is responding to the needs of our consumers,” the statement said.

Milk companies worry that concern over cloning could turn people away from dairy products. So far, public opinion appears mixed. A September poll by the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology found that 64 percent of respondents were uncomfortable with animal cloning. And a December poll by the University of Maryland found that the same percentage would buy, or consider buying, such food if the government said it was safe.

3/8/2007