Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Michigan, Ohio latest states to find HPAI in dairy herds
The USDA’s Farmers.gov local dashboard available nationwide
Urban Acres helpng Peoria residents grow food locally
Illinois dairy farmers were digging into soil health week

Farmers expected to plant less corn, more soybeans, in 2024
Deere 4440 cab tractor racked up $18,000 at farm retirement auction
Indiana legislature passes bills for ag land purchases, broadband grants
Make spring planting safety plans early to avoid injuries
Michigan soybean grower visits Dubai to showcase U.S. products
Scientists are interested in eclipse effects on crops and livestock
U.S. retail meat demand for pork and beef both decreased in 2023
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Ag groups oppose proposed EPA greenhouse gas rules
In politics, a coalition of 138 agricultural organizations, including National Milk, have sent a letter to Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Ark.) supporting her introduction of a resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act regarding the decision of the Environmental Protection Agency to move ahead on regulating carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act.

National Milk’s Chris Galen said in Thursday’s broadcast that this is the next step in a process that began late last year when the EPA concluded that greenhouse gases are a danger to public health and moved forward with a process to regulate gas emissions like carbon dioxide and methane under the Clean Air Act.

The letter supports the prevention of EPA from doing this because the agricultural organizations believe the Clean Air Act is not the appropriate way to establish greenhouse gas policy and could lead to a variety of costly unintended consequences. He added that others, not involved in farming, also share this concern and do not favor creation of a carbon tax or anything similar.

The letter points out that the Clean Air Act was never really intended to deal with global warming or to mitigate greenhouse gases so there is no precedent for this, Galen argued, other than a few years ago the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a ruling stating that the EPA had the power to regulate greenhouse gases.

Galen said they are trying to prevent that from happening and are concerned that another approach to this would be a “cap and trade” system, but it doesn’t appear that Congress will move aggressively on that in 2010; however, the main concern is “making certain the EPA doesn’t unilaterally move down a path of unintended consequences by regulating greenhouse gases using the Clean Air Act.”

Lawsuit filed against Deans
In another governmental involvement issue, the U.S. Department of Justice and three states have filed an antitrust lawsuit against Dean Foods, challenging its 2009 acquisition of two milk processing plants in Wisconsin.

Dairy Profit Weekly Editor Dave Natzke reported in Friday’s DairyLine that the Justice Department has been joined by attorneys general in Wisconsin, Illinois, and Michigan in filing the lawsuit against Deans, the largest fluid milk bottler in the United States. The suit challenges Dean’s 2009 purchase of two fluid milk plants from Foremost Farms, a Wisconsin-based dairy cooperative.
The complaint, filed in federal court in the Eastern District of Wisconsin, alleges the transaction will lessen competition in the region’s fluid and school milk markets. Court documents say the addition of the two plants has given Deans a 57 percent share of the fluid milk market in the region.

The suit requests Dean’s divest assets and interests it acquired when purchasing plants in Waukesha and DePere, Wis. It also asked that Deans be required to give a 30-day notice when making future acquisitions.

Foremost Farms is not named in the suit, Natzke said, and has declined comment, saying it followed all laws and regulations related to the sale. Foremost with 2,300 dairy farmer members in seven states, continues to provide milk to Dean Foods through a supply contract, according to Natzke.

Deans said it will defend itself vigorously against the complaint, saying the transaction benefitted Wisconsin dairy farmers by providing a stable and growing outlet for their milk, and produced cost-savings for its milk customers.

The lawsuit is an outgrowth of antitrust policy changes since the Obama Administration took office, according to Natzke. The Department of Justice and USDA have scheduled several public “workshops” beginning this spring to explore competition and regulatory issues in the agriculture industry and kick off with a general workshop in Iowa, in March, followed by a dairy industry workshop, set for June, in Wisconsin. The workshops will analyze agricultural markets nationally, and look at the discrepancies between the prices received by farmers and the prices paid by consumers, Natzke concluded.

Manager supports checkoff
The beef checkoff got high marks from another member of the dairy industry this week. Richard Silacci, manager of the dairy farm at Cal Poly, spoke in Wednesday’s “Beef Board Update” and discussed the emphasis on quality, and how it applies to farmers. He said the checkoff provides education to the public regarding dairy cows and how they are managed.

“A lot of the news that consumers are seeing is usually negative and that winds up on television and radio,” Silacci said, “And with the checkoff dollars we see positive publicity.” Information as to what really goes on, on the farm is made known, he said, “and the good things we do that insure beef quality.”

The checkoff also educates farmers and that’s what is taught to students at Cal Poly, according to Silacci.

The farm milks about 170 cows of two breeds, he said, and they teach students that, when giving vaccinations or injections, certain sites on the cow are better than others to improve the quality of the beef when the cow goes to the slaughter house and, in turn, is sold to consumers.

Students are also taught the opportune time to cull a cow, he said, so they don’t let a cow get to the point where she is “unhealthy looking and skinny.”

In dairy checkoff news, 60 percent of U.S. schools are now enrolled in the “Fuel Up to Play 60” campaign and Pennsylvania dairy producer and vice chair of the National Dairy Board, Paula Meabon, talked about it in Monday’s “DMI Update.

The campaign got some extra press at a Jan. 15 news conference, which announced the partnership of the USDA, National Dairy Council, and the National Football League.

The NFL brings “star power” to the program, Meabon said, and all 32 teams are engaged. “USDA’s stamp of approval makes it a great program to help the youth fight against obesity,” Meabon said. “And that’s what this program is all about. It’s for our kids.”
Students can choose from various activities such as a basketball club or a running club, which is a fitness program for 60 minutes a day. Nutrition guidance is also part of the program, she said, and dairy is a big part of that, along with fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. She called it a “win-win for our children.”

The kickoff of the program was last October, according to Meabon, and 40,000 schools were involved. Today, it numbers 58,000 and growing, and she stated that, “Schools must sign up themselves so it’s a commitment the schools are taking upon themselves for their youth.”
2/4/2010