Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Kentucky farmer turns one-time tobacco plot into gourd patch
Look at field residue as treasure rather than as trash to get rid of
Kentucky farm wins prestigious environmental stewardship award
Beekeeping Boot Camp offers hands-on learning
Kentucky debuts ‘Friends of Agriculture’ license plate
Legislation gives Hoosier vendors more opportunities to sell products
1-on-1 with House Ag leader Glenn Thompson 
Increasing production line speeds saves pork producers $10 per head
US soybean groups return from trade mission in Torreón, Mexico
Indiana fishery celebrates 100th year of operation
Katie Brown, new IPPA leader brings research background
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Later planting date helps Indiana soybean test site

By SUSAN BLOWER
Indiana Correspondent

WINDFALL, Ind. — In a field test of soybean hybrids in central Indiana, Kruger’s K-348RR/SCN narrowly outperformed the competition. The test was managed by Farmer’s Independent Research of Seed Technologies (F.I.R.S.T.).

The test plot on Steve Pierce’s Tipton County, Ind., farm featured well-drained silty clay loam, with a 0.5 percent slope.

Kruger was followed by Becks 383NRR and iCORN.com 3.45, respectively. Kruger yielded 72.2 bushels per acre, as compared to Becks with 71.2 and iCORN.com’s 69.1.

Gross income topped out at $793.80 with Kruger, $783.50 with Becks, and $760.50 with iCORN.com.

Approximately 210,000 seeds were planted on May 29, resulting in 205,600 stands on Oct. 21.

“The later planting date helped with emergence and final stand. Tall plant height (34 to 36 inches) led to lodging of some varieties. Steve had to replant some of the field around the plot three times,” said F.I.R.S.T. manager, Rich Schleuning.

The previous crop was corn treated with Roundup herbicide.
A complete listing of the test results can be found at www.firstseedtests.com

Schleuning recommended that producers take a look at the regional summaries located on the website for additional information.

He said checking the performance of hybrids against soil types that resemble theirs would provide valuable information.

“This year was probably one of the toughest years I have had with the way the spring, summer and fall turned out ... This was a good year to look at from a data standpoint,” Schleuning said.
Measuring the performance of the various hybrids against the tough weather conditions should give producers good information, he said.

“Many of the yields were better than anticipated,” he added.
“Early planting dates are key things, but with the weather planting early was not an option. We did everything we could do with the circumstances we had.”

11/19/2008